CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Dansk Botanisk Arkiv

scientific journal (1913–1981)

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 1, 2024
Entity authorityQ5221061 ↗
Source-derived summary

Dansk Botanisk Arkiv was a Danish scientific journal or monograph series concerning botany, issued by the Danish Botanical Society. It was published from 1913 to 1980.

Articles were written in Danish, German, English and French. The synonym Res Botanicae Danicae was printed on the front page of some issues.

In 1980, it was fused with Botaniska Notiser Supplement under the name Opera Botanica, which since then has been the monograph series of the Nordic Journal of Botany.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Dansk Botanisk Arkiv” as scientific journal (1913–1981). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Dansk, Botanisk and Arkiv.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1913, 1980—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1913. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Dansk, Botanisk and Arkiv providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Dansk Botanisk Arkiv”, the useful work is to connect “scientific journal (1913–1981)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 1, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q5221061. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1913 and 1980.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Dansk Botanisk Arkiv”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Dansk Botanisk Arkiv primary sources, Dansk Botanisk Arkiv archive and Dansk research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dansk Botanisk Arkiv”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Dansk Botanisk Arkiv” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.