Danish Arabia expedition
Expedition led by Carsten Niebuhr

The Danish Arabia expedition (Danish: Den Arabiske Rejse) was a Danish scientific expedition to Egypt, Arabia, and Syria. Its principal goal was to elucidate the Old Testament with additional research goals concerned with natural history, geography, and cartography. The expedition began in 1761. It had six members, of whom only Carsten Niebuhr survived, returning to Denmark in 1767. The journey has been chronicled by the 20th century novelist, Thorkild Hansen, in his novel Arabia Felix.
Members
Six people went on the expedition, and five died. † denotes which members died on the expedition.
Peter Forsskål†: Finnish/Swedish natural scientist and student of Carl Linnaeus; his main task was to find supporting evidence for a number of Linnaeus' accounts.
Frederik Christian von Haven†: Philologist, was tasked to purchase oriental manuscripts and to transcribe inscriptions. Furthermore, to make observations on the Arabic language, with a focus to help on the obscure passages of the Old Testament.
“Danish Arabia expedition” enters the record as expedition led by Carsten Niebuhr. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Danish, Arabia and expedition can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Danish Arabia expedition” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Danish, Arabia and expedition provides the most credible route into that argument.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q624082. VIAF identifies the subject as 87149066377465600874. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1761 and 1767.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Danish Arabia expedition”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Danish Arabia expedition primary sources, Danish Arabia expedition archive and Danish research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Danish Arabia expedition”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Danish Arabia expedition” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.