Daniela Stock
Australian structural biologist
Daniela Stock is an Australian scientist at the Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute with a conjoint position at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia. She is a structural biologist whose research has provided insight into the molecular picture of rotary ATPases.
Stock was a graduate student and postdoctoral scientist at the Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry in Munich, Germany.
Stock started the Structural and Computational Biology Division at the Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute.
She was elected as a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Science in 2016.
Career
Stock has led ground breaking work describing molecular rotary motors which are used in the conversion of biological energy, known as rotary ATPases. The Australian Academy of Science states that Stock has "redefined bioenergetics of the 1990s by solving the x-ray structure" of yeast mitochondrial ATPase. Stock has worked on the structure and function of ATP synthases, as the Principal Investigator on multiple NHMRC grants . She was a proponent of the development plan for use of Crystallographers using the Australian Synchrotron, to create a high-speed Macromolecular Crystallography Environment.
Media
Stock was interviewed in the 2012 Challenging Ideas series from IBMCINEB, where researchers from seminars invited speakers to discuss thought-provoking ideas.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Daniela Stock” is australian structural biologist. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Daniela, Stock and Australian, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “australian structural biologist” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q62591540. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2016 and 2012.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Daniela Stock”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Daniela Stock primary sources, Daniela Stock archive and Daniela research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Daniela Stock”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Daniela Stock” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.