CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Daniel Webb (British Army officer)

British Army general

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 24, 2026
Entity authorityQ16206671
Source-derived summary

Daniel Webb (c. 1700 – 11 November 1773) was a British Army general. He is best known for his actions during the French and Indian War.

Biography

At the age of twenty, Webb purchased a commission in the British Army at the rank of ensign on 20 March 1720. In 1742, Webb was promoted to the rank of major while serving in the 8th Regiment of Horse, and he fought at the battle of Dettingen on 27 June 1743. Three years later in April 1745, Webb was again promoted to the rank of lieutenant colonel and on 11 May of that year fought at the battle of Fontenoy. In 1755, he was made colonel of the 48th Regiment of Foot. After the outbreak of the French and Indian War in 1754, Webb sailed to North America as a subordinate of Lord Loudoun.

He participated in British military operations around Lake George in 1757, which culminated in the siege of Fort William Henry. Believing a French prisoner's report that besieging forces under the command of Louis-Joseph de Montcalm were 11,000-men strong, Webb refused to send any of his approximately 1,600 troops north to relieve the British garrison at Fort William Henry, since Webb's men were all that stood between the French and Albany, New York. He was subsequently recalled due to his actions; British Indian Department official William Johnson later wrote that Webb was "the only Englishman [I] ever knew who was a coward".

Editorial summary

“Daniel Webb (British Army officer)” enters the record as british Army general. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Daniel, Webb and British can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1700, 1773, 1720, 1742—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Daniel, Webb and British.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Daniel Webb (British Army officer)” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Daniel, Webb and British provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16206671. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1700, 1773, 1720 and 1742.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Daniel Webb (British Army officer)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Daniel Webb (British Army officer) primary sources, Daniel Webb (British Army officer) archive and Daniel research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Daniel Webb (British Army officer)”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Daniel Webb (British Army officer)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.