CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Daniel Serrano

Spanish jurist, politician and lawyer

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ19950623 ↗
Source-derived summary

Daniel Serrano Coronado (born 18 June 1976) is a Spanish politician. He was a member of the Parliament of Catalonia from 2019 to 2021 and from 2022 to 2024. From 2011 to 2015, he was a member of the Congress of Deputies.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Daniel Serrano” as spanish jurist, politician and lawyer. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1976, 2019, 2021, 2022—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1976-06-18. The account is most persuasive where Daniel, Serrano and Spanish can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the people & ideas register because the source frames it as spanish jurist, politician and lawyer. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q19950623. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1976, 2019, 2021 and 2022.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Daniel Serrano”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Daniel Serrano primary sources, Daniel Serrano archive and Daniel research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Daniel Serrano”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Daniel Serrano” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.