CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Daniel O. Dahlstrom

American philosopher

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ76889734 ↗
Source-derived summary

Daniel Oscar Dahlstrom (born 1948) is an American philosopher and John R. Silber Professor of Philosophy at Boston University.

Works

Identity, Authenticity, and Humility. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 2017.

The Heidegger Dictionary. New York: Bloomsbury Academics, 2013.

Dahlstrom, Daniel O. (2008). Philosophical Legacies: Essays on the Thought of Kant, Hegel, and Their Contemporaries (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, Volume 50). Catholic University of America Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt284z77. ISBN 978-0-8132-1521-1.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Daniel O. Dahlstrom” as american philosopher. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1948, 2017, 2013, 2008—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Daniel, Dahlstrom and American can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the people & ideas register because the source frames it as american philosopher. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q76889734. The first chronological checks are 1948, 2017, 2013 and 2008.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Daniel O. Dahlstrom”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Daniel O. Dahlstrom primary sources, Daniel O. Dahlstrom archive and Daniel research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Daniel O. Dahlstrom”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Daniel O. Dahlstrom” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.