CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Daniel Langre

Mexican tennis player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 7, 2026
Entity authorityQ114185426
Source-derived summary

Daniel Langre (born 7 March 1981) is a Mexican former professional tennis player.

Born and raised in Mexico City, Langre was national junior champion in multiple age groups and as a doubles player was a world number six ITF Junior. He played collegiate tennis for the USC Trojans and was a member of the 2002 NCAA Division I championship team. On the professional tour, he won one singles and three doubles titles at the ITF Futures level. In 2004, he represented Mexico in a Davis Cup tie against Jamaica, winning both his singles and doubles rubbers. He made the doubles semi-finals of a 2005 Challenger in Mexico City with his 37-year-old coach Leonardo Lavalle.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Daniel Langre” is mexican tennis player. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Daniel, Langre and Mexican, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1981, 2002, 2004, 2005—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Daniel, Langre and Mexican is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “mexican tennis player” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q114185426. The first chronological checks are 1981, 2002, 2004 and 2005.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Daniel Langre”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Daniel Langre primary sources, Daniel Langre archive and Daniel research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Daniel Langre”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Daniel Langre” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.