CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Daniel Jones (British Army officer)

Army officer

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ23614671 ↗
Source-derived summary

Lieutenant-General Daniel Jones (c.1725 – 20 November 1793) was a British Army officer who became colonel of the 2nd (The Queen's Royal) Regiment of Foot.

Military career

Jones became a lieutenant in the 3rd Foot Guards in 1749. Promoted to major-general in 1777, he fought in the American Revolutionary War. He went on to be colonel of the 2nd (The Queen's Royal) Regiment of Foot on 12 August 1777.

References

Sources

Cannon, Richard (1838). Historical Record of the Second, or Queen's Royal Regiment of Foot. London: Clowes and Sons.

Editorial summary

“Daniel Jones (British Army officer)” enters the record as army officer. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Daniel, Jones and British can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1725, 1793, 1749, 1777—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Daniel, Jones and British.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Daniel Jones (British Army officer)” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Daniel, Jones and British provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q23614671. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1725, 1793, 1749 and 1777.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Daniel Jones (British Army officer)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Daniel Jones (British Army officer) primary sources, Daniel Jones (British Army officer) archive and Daniel research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Daniel Jones (British Army officer)”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Daniel Jones (British Army officer)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.