CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Wolfgang Dandorfer

German politician (1949–2023)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 31, 2023
Entity authorityQ118023
Source-derived summary

Wolfgang Dandorfer (5 June 1949 – 29 July 2023) was a German politician who was a member of the Christian Social Union in Bavaria (CSU).

Biography

Wolfgang Dandorfer was born in Vilseck on 5 June 1949.

He was mayor of Amberg from 1990 until leaving office in April 2014. He was also a member of the Landtag of Bavaria between 1982 and 1990.

Dandorfer died of a heart attack on 29 July 2023, at the age of 74.

Editorial summary

“Wolfgang Dandorfer” enters the record as german politician (1949–2023). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Wolfgang, Dandorfer and German can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1949, 2023, 1990, 2014—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1949-06-05. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Wolfgang, Dandorfer and German.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Wolfgang Dandorfer” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Wolfgang, Dandorfer and German provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 31, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q118023. VIAF identifies the subject as 35644425. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1949, 2023, 1990 and 2014.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Wolfgang Dandorfer”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Wolfgang Dandorfer primary sources, Wolfgang Dandorfer archive and Wolfgang research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Wolfgang Dandorfer”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Wolfgang Dandorfer” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.