CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Dance of a Thousand Promises

extended play by Intercooler

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 28, 2022
Entity authorityQ5215269 ↗
Source-derived summary

Dance Of A Thousand Promises is an EP by Australian band Intercooler. It was originally released in October 2004.

Track listing

"Lovin' And Leavin'"

"If I Try"

"Cream Puff"

"Sugarplum"

"You're Not Gonna Hurt Us Again"

Notes

All songs written by Phil Ballantyne and Intercooler.

Tracks 1, 3, 4, and 5 produced by Magoo and Intercooler.

Track 2 produced by Paul "Woody" Annison.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Dance of a Thousand Promises” as extended play by Intercooler. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA productive route into publication, performance and collection histories when the underlying object or edition remains clearly identified. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2004—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2004. The account is most persuasive where Dance, Thousand and Promises can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the arts & letters register because the source frames it as extended play by Intercooler. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Reception evidence should be dated and situated: later canonical status may differ sharply from the work’s initial circulation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 28, 2022. The linked authority identifier is Q5215269. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2004.

Critical limits

Later fame can flatten the distinction between original context, subsequent adaptation and institutional collecting history. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Dance of a Thousand Promises”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Dance of a Thousand Promises primary sources, Dance of a Thousand Promises archive and Dance research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dance of a Thousand Promises”?
  2. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
  3. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Dance of a Thousand Promises” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.