CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Dalseong Bin clan

Korean clan from Daegu

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 2, 2023
Entity authorityQ17189478 ↗
Source-derived summary

Dalseong Bin clan (Korean: 수성 빈씨; Hanja: 壽城 賓氏) is one of the Korean clans. Their Bon-gwan is in Suseong District, Daegu. According to the research held in 2015, the number of Dalseong Bin clan’s member was 4208. Their founder was Bin U gwang who was a Hanlin Academy in Song dynasty. When Song dynasty was collapsed, he was naturalized in Goryeo having his valuable books. Then, he made contributions to developing academy. As a result, Chungsuk of Goryeo appointed Bin U gwang as Prince of Suseong.

See also

Korean clan names of foreign origin

References

External links

Doosan Encyclopedia 외래귀화성씨 外來歸化姓氏. Doosan Encyclopedia.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Dalseong Bin clan” as korean clan from Daegu. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Dalseong, clan and Korean.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2015—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Dalseong, clan and Korean providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Dalseong Bin clan”, the useful work is to connect “korean clan from Daegu” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 2, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q17189478. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2015.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Dalseong Bin clan”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Dalseong Bin clan primary sources, Dalseong Bin clan archive and Dalseong research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dalseong Bin clan”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Dalseong Bin clan” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.