CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Dallas Trahern

American baseball player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ5211439
Source-derived summary

Dallas Neal Trahern (born November 29, 1985) is an American former professional baseball pitcher. He played in international competition with USA Baseball.

Trahern was drafted by the Detroit Tigers in the 34th round of the 2004 Major League Baseball draft. He was traded along with Burke Badenhop, Eulogio De La Cruz, Cameron Maybin, Andrew Miller, and Mike Rabelo to the Florida Marlins in exchange for Miguel Cabrera and Dontrelle Willis.

He is known as a sinkerball pitcher and in 2009 had Tommy John surgery.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Dallas Trahern” as american baseball player. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Dallas, Trahern and American.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1985, 2004, 2009—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1985-11-29. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Dallas, Trahern and American providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Dallas Trahern”, the useful work is to connect “american baseball player” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5211439. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1985, 2004 and 2009.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Dallas Trahern”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Dallas Trahern primary sources, Dallas Trahern archive and Dallas research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dallas Trahern”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Dallas Trahern” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.