CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Daiei Film

Japanese film company

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 5, 2026
Entity authorityQ4390090 ↗
Source-derived summary

Daiei Film Co. Ltd. (大映株式会社) was a Japanese film studio. In 1942, it was established as Dai Nippon Film Production (大日本映画製作, Dai-Nippon Eiga Seisaku) through corporate consolidation under the government's wartime controls, and in 1945, the company name was changed to simply Daiei (大映株式会社).

Overview

It was one of the major studios during the postwar Golden Age of Japanese cinema, boasting a roster of directors like Kenji Mizoguchi, Kenji Misumi, and Yasuzō Masumura, alongside stars such as Shintaro Katsu, Ichikawa Raizō VIII, Machiko Kyō, Ayako Wakao, Fujiko Yamamoto, and Jirō Tamiya. It produced not only artistic masterpieces, such as Akira Kurosawa's Rashomon (1950), Mizoguchi's Ugetsu (1953) and Sansho the Bailiff (1954), and Teinosuke Kinugasa's Gate of Hell (1953) but also launched several film franchise, such as Gamera, Zatoichi and Yokai Monsters, and made the three Daimajin films (1966).

Amid the rise of television, the entire Japanese cinema underwent significant decline. Daiei failed to build a solid foundation (such as to secure stable systems for productions and distributions) and to diversify, and it went bankrupt in 1971.

In 1974, the company was restructured as the production studio Daiei Film by the publisher Tokuma Shoten, producing critical and commercial hits such as The Silk Road (1988), and Shall We Dance? (1996).

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Daiei Film” as japanese film company. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Daiei, Film and Japanese.

Editorial reviewA productive route into publication, performance and collection histories when the underlying object or edition remains clearly identified. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1942, 1945, 1950, 1953—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1942-01-01. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Daiei, Film and Japanese providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Daiei Film”, the useful work is to connect “japanese film company” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Reception evidence should be dated and situated: later canonical status may differ sharply from the work’s initial circulation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4390090. VIAF identifies the subject as 308181405. The Library of Congress control number is n2014017091. 2 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1942, 1945, 1950 and 1953.

Critical limits

Rights, attribution and provenance may remain disputed even when a general reference summary presents a stable account. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Daiei Film”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Daiei Film primary sources, Daiei Film archive and Daiei research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Daiei Film”?
  2. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
  3. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Daiei Film” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.