Dai Chunning
Chinese businessman
Dai Chunning (simplified Chinese: 戴春宁; traditional Chinese: 戴春寧; pinyin: Daì Chūnníng; born February 1962) is a former Chinese business executive. He served as the deputy general manager of the China Export & Credit Insurance Corporation (also known as Sinosure) from 2012 to 2013.
Dai began his career as a bank loans administrator in Wuzhong, Ningxia. He then made his way up the ranks of the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China in Ningxia, then was transferred to work in Beijing under the national risk management division. He then worked in the loans administration and general operations departments of the Exim Bank of China. In March 2010 he was promoted to lead the general services division of the bank. Beginning in August 2011 he served as the chief assistant to the bank's president. In April 2012 he began working for Sinosure as a vice-president. As he was a senior executive at a state-owned corporation, he also held the rank of a department-prefecture level official on China's civil service hierarchy.
On December 1, 2013, Dai was detained for investigation for "severe violations of discipline and law" by the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, the Communist Party's anti-graft agency.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Dai Chunning” is chinese businessman. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Chunning, Chinese and businessman, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “chinese businessman” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q18415712. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1962, 2012, 2013 and 2010.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Dai Chunning”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Dai Chunning primary sources, Dai Chunning archive and Chunning research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dai Chunning”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Dai Chunning” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.