CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Dadong Arts Center

art center in Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ10935754 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Dadong Arts Center (traditional Chinese: 大東文化藝術中心; simplified Chinese: 大东文化艺术中心; pinyin: Dàdōng Wénhuà Yìshù Zhōngxīn) is an art center in Fengshan District, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

History

The construction of the center started in September 2008. It was completed in March 2012.

Architecture

The center was designed by MAYU architects, de Architekten Cie and constructed by Arup and Tien-Hun Engineering Consultant Inc. It consists of theater, exhibition center, library and education center.

Editorial summary

“Dadong Arts Center” enters the record as art center in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Dadong, Arts and Center can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2008, 2012—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2012-03. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Dadong, Arts and Center.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Dadong Arts Center” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Dadong, Arts and Center provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q10935754. Authority coordinates are 22.625, 120.363. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2008 and 2012.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Dadong Arts Center”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Dadong Arts Center primary sources, Dadong Arts Center archive and Dadong research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dadong Arts Center”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Dadong Arts Center” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.