CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

C/1945 X1 (du Toit)

comet

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 31, 2026
Entity authorityQ25392294 ↗
Source-derived summary

Comet du Toit, formal designation C/1945 X1, is a sungrazing comet that was observed four times by South African astronomer, Daniel du Toit, in December 1945. The comet is a member of the Kreutz sungrazer family. It passed about 400,000 km (250,000 mi) from the surface of the Sun.

Discovery and observations

The comet was discovered by Daniel du Toit from the Harvard College Observatory of Bloemfontein, South Africa shortly after midnight on 11 December 1945, where he estimated its brightness as a 7th-magnitude object. He only managed to make four observations of the comet in the following nights, during which the comet rapidly moved towards the Sun. At the beginning of January 1946, Leland E. Cunningham calculated a preliminary orbit from du Toit's observation data, and concluded that the comet may have reached perihelion by 27–28 December 1945 which should have been a "brilliant object in the naked eye". However, a subsequent search on coronagraph images showed no signs of the comet, even at positions predicted by Cunningham.

It is not certain whether or not the comet fully disintegrated during perihelion or it survived but simply remained unobserved.

Orbit

It has a very short observation arc of 4 days based on 4 observations and an assumed eccentricity of 1.0. In 1967, Brian G. Marsden initially determined several possible parabolic orbits of comets (including du Toit) that were similar to that of C/1882 R1 and C/1965 S1 (Ikeya–Seki).

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “C/1945 X1 (du Toit)” as comet. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Toit and comet.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1945, 1946, 1967, 1882—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Toit and comet providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “C/1945 X1 (du Toit)”, the useful work is to connect “comet” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 31, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q25392294. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1945, 1946, 1967 and 1882.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “C/1945 X1 (du Toit)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow C/1945 X1 (du Toit) primary sources, C/1945 X1 (du Toit) archive and Toit research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “C/1945 X1 (du Toit)”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “C/1945 X1 (du Toit)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.