Omega (Cyrillic)
letter used in the early Cyrillic alphabet

Omega (Ѡ ѡ; italics: Ѡ ѡ) is a letter used in the early Cyrillic alphabet. Its name and capital form are derived directly from the Greek letter Omega ⟨Ω ω⟩.
In some forms it looks similar to the letter We.
Unlike Greek, the Slavic languages had only a single /ɔ/ sound, so Omega was little used compared to the letter O (О о), descended from the Greek letter Omicron. In the older ustav writing, Omega was used mainly for its numeric value of 800, and rarely appeared even in Greek words. In later semi-ustav manuscripts it was used for decorative purposes, along with the broad version ⟨Ꙍ ꙍ⟩ as well as the Broad On ⟨Ѻ ѻ⟩.
Modern Church Slavonic has developed strict rules for the use of these letterforms.
Another variation of omega is the ornate or beautiful omega, used as an interjection, "O!". It is represented in Unicode 5.1 by the misnamed character omega with titlo ⟨Ѽ ѽ⟩. It descends from the Greek omega with the smooth breathing (psili) and circumflex (perispomeni) diacritical marks ⟨Ὦ ὦ⟩, also used in the corresponding exclamation in ancient Greek.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Omega (Cyrillic)” as letter used in the early Cyrillic alphabet. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as letter used in the early Cyrillic alphabet. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 9, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q424863. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Omega (Cyrillic)”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Omega (Cyrillic) primary sources, Omega (Cyrillic) archive and Omega research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Omega (Cyrillic)”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Omega (Cyrillic)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.