CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Erismatopterus

extinct genus of fishes

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ56324603
Source-derived summary

Erismatopterus is an extinct genus of percopsiform fish which lived during the early to middle Eocene epoch and containing the single species Erismatopterus levatus. A report of the genus in sediments of similar age in Washington State have been discredited. Erismatopterus is treated as part of the family Percopsidae, but formerly was the type genus of the extinct family Erismatopteridae. The genus is closely related to Amphiplaga of related lake sediments. Shoaling behavior has been reported from a mass mortality fossil of E. levatus and attributed as a predator-evasion response behavior.

Distribution

Erismatopterus levatus is known from solitary fossils and mass mortality groups which are compression-impression fossils preserved in layers of soft sedimentary rock. Along with other well preserved fish fossils, the E. levatus specimens are found in several outcrops of the Early to Middle Eocene Green River Formations Lake Gosiute and Lake Uinta. The formation is a group of Late Paleocene to Late Eocene depositional basins in Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah. Of the three paleolakes that comprise the formation, E. levatus seems to have been absent from Fossil Lake. Study of the paleoflora preserved in the formation indicates the lake was around 1,500–2,900 metres (4,900–9,500 ft) in elevation surrounded by a tropical to subtropical environment that had a distinct dry season.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Erismatopterus” is extinct genus of fishes. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Erismatopterus, extinct and genus, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current 212-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Erismatopterus, extinct and genus is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “extinct genus of fishes” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q56324603. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Erismatopterus”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Erismatopterus primary sources, Erismatopterus archive and Erismatopterus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Erismatopterus”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Erismatopterus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.