CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Cyphellostereum

genus of fungi

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 9, 2025
Entity authorityQ5200217
Source-derived summary

Cyphellostereum is a genus of basidiolichens. Species produce white, somewhat cup-shaped fruit bodies on a thin film of green on soil which is the thallus. All Cyphellostereum species have nonamyloid spores and tissues, lack clamp connections, and also lack hymenial cystidia.

DNA research has shown that a common, north temperate species formerly known as Cyphellostereum laeve is not related to the type species and belongs in a quite separate order, the Hymenochaetales. It has been renamed Muscinupta laevis.

Etymology

The name Cyphellostereum combines two generic names: Cyphella in reference to the inverted cupulate form (like the genus Cyphella); and Stereum, in reference to the stipitate fan-shape or bracket shape (as in species of Stereum).

Evolution and morphology

Multilocus phylogenetic trees recover Cyphellostereum as a monophyletic, basal branch that is sister to all other genera in the Dictyonema clade. Occupying this early-diverging spot, the genus retains the simplest thallus: a bluish, crust-like weave of cyanobacterial filaments (trichomes) sheathed by the fungus, with no layered cortex or medulla that would distinguish an upper or lower surface. Its reproductive structures are tiny, cup-shaped cyphelloid fruiting bodies (basidiocarps) that sit on the thallus rather than being swallowed by it; the hyphae that build these cups differ markedly from the slender hyphae that merely clothe the photobiont threads. The fungal sheath is made of irregular, cylindrical cells full of air-gaps and it entirely lacks the tubular haustoria and "jigsaw-puzzle" cell walls that later genera use to tap nutrients from the cyanobacteria.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Cyphellostereum” is genus of fungi. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Cyphellostereum, genus and fungi, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current 246-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Cyphellostereum, genus and fungi is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “genus of fungi” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 9, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5200217. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cyphellostereum”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cyphellostereum primary sources, Cyphellostereum archive and Cyphellostereum research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cyphellostereum”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Cyphellostereum” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.