CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Cymenshore

place in Southern England

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 11, 2026
Entity authorityQ5199521 ↗
Source-derived summary

Cymenshore was a place in Southern England where, according to the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, Ælle of Sussex landed in AD 477 and battled the Britons with his three sons Cymen, Wlencing and Cissa, after the first of whom Cymenshore was held to have been named. The spelling Cymenshore is a scholarly modernisation of the Old English Cȳmenes ōra, which is now lost. Its location is unclear but was probably near Selsey.

Etymology

The earliest surviving manuscript to contain the name is the late ninth-century Manuscript A of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, which gives it in the form Cymenesora. Outside the Chronicle, what is generally believed to be the same name is next attested in a thirteenth-century manuscript: this includes a copy of a charter adapted from a charter issued in 957, which gives the form on Cymeneres horan and also a copy of a forged charter purporting to date from 673 but perhaps originally composed in the tenth century, which gives the form in Cumeneshore. These and other spellings in late manuscripts (Cymensora, Cumenshore and Cimeneres horan) are generally accepted by scholars to derive from an Old English place-name, now lost, whose Old English form was Cȳmenes ōra.

The West Saxon past participle cumen, meaning “come” or “having come,” provides a plausible origin for the name Cymen (or Cuman), though its literal sense makes it unlikely as a conventional birth-name. Beyond the simple notion of arrival, cumen could carry extended meanings such as achievement, attainment, or successful completion of an enterprise, making it appropriate as a descriptive or triumphal designation. In Old English practice, unusual or aspirational names were sometimes applied under exceptional circumstances—for example, Unwēn (“beyond expectation”)—but a more compelling interpretation for Cymenes ōra is as a leadership or honorific title, conferred on a figure whose success in colonization or conquest warranted commemoration. Analogous patterns are evident elsewhere: the sons of Port Victor, Bieda and Mægla, bear names celebrating accomplishment rather than inheritance, reflecting a wider tendency to memorialize achievement.

Editorial summary

“Cymenshore” enters the record as place in Southern England. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Cymenshore, place and Southern can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 329-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Cymenshore, place and Southern.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Cymenshore” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Cymenshore, place and Southern provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5199521. Authority coordinates are 50.732, -0.789. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cymenshore”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cymenshore primary sources, Cymenshore archive and Cymenshore research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cymenshore”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Cymenshore” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.