Custos Rotulorum of the North Riding of Yorkshire
Wikimedia list article

This is a list of people who have served as Custos Rotulorum of the North Riding of Yorkshire.
Sir Leonard Beckwith bef. 1544 – aft. 1547
Sir Henry Gates bef. 1562–1589
John Stanhope, 1st Baron Stanhope 1545–1621
Sir Thomas Posthumous Hoby 1621–1626
Sir David Foulis, 1st Baronet 1626–1629
Sir Thomas Posthumous Hoby 1629–1640
Henry Belasyse 1641–1646
Interregnum
Thomas Belasyse, 1st Earl Fauconberg 1660–1700
Charles Boyle, 2nd Earl of Burlington 1701–1704
Henry Boyle, 1st Baron Carleton 1704–1715
Richard Boyle, 3rd Earl of Burlington 1715–1722
Conyers Darcy 1722
Richard Boyle, 3rd Earl of Burlington 1722–1733
Thomas Watson-Wentworth, 1st Marquess of Rockingham 1733–1750
Charles Watson-Wentworth, 2nd Marquess of Rockingham 1751–1762
Robert Darcy, 4th Earl of Holderness 1762–1765
Charles Watson-Wentworth, 2nd Marquess of Rockingham 1765–1782
Henry Belasyse, 2nd Earl Fauconberg 1782–1802
For later custodes rotulorum, see Lord Lieutenant of the North Riding of Yorkshire.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Custos Rotulorum of the North Riding of Yorkshire” is wikimedia list article. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Custos, Rotulorum and North, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “wikimedia list article” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 28, 2022. The linked authority identifier is Q5196581. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1544, 1547, 1562 and 1589.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Custos Rotulorum of the North Riding of Yorkshire”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Custos Rotulorum of the North Riding of Yorkshire primary sources, Custos Rotulorum of the North Riding of Yorkshire archive and Custos research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Custos Rotulorum of the North Riding of Yorkshire”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Custos Rotulorum of the North Riding of Yorkshire” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.