Swear jar
a scheme invented by parents to keep their kids from swearing

A swear jar (also known as a swearing jar, cuss jar, swear box or cuss bank) is a device intended to discourage people from using profanity. Every time someone uses profanity, others who witness it collect a fine, by requiring that the offender put some money into the container. The concept had existed since at least the 16th century and the modern concept appears to have originated in the 1890s.
Description
A swear jar is intended to discourage people from using profanity. When a person is witnessed using profanity, the witness assesses a fine by insisting that the offender put some money into the jar or box. The container may be made of glass, porcelain, or metal, and may have a lid with a slot. A swear jar might not be a physical object; instead, a notional swear jar is referred to in order to indicate someone's use of profanity has been noted.
From time to time, the accumulated money may be used, often for some agreed-upon personal purpose or contributed to charity.
History
Though not explicitly named a swear jar, the concept had existed since the 16th century:
"At Aberdeen in 1592 the attention of the council was specially engaged in repressing the swearing of "horrible and execrable oaths." They proceeded to put on foot a system of fines, and with a degree of confidence that is hardly commendable, they authorised the heads of families to keep a box in which to place the mulcts they were empowered to inflict in their households. Servants' wages were liable to be taxed at the will of their masters, and wives' pin-money at the instance of their lords."
The modern concept appears to have originated in the 1890s, under the name swear box, and to have gained popularity in the 1910s.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Swear jar” as a scheme invented by parents to keep their kids from swearing. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as a scheme invented by parents to keep their kids from swearing. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q18393165. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1592.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Swear jar”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Swear jar primary sources, Swear jar archive and Swear research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Swear jar”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Swear jar” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.