CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

academic journal

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 24, 2024
Entity authorityQ24907969 ↗
Source-derived summary

Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a bimonthly peer-reviewed academic journal covering all aspects of the behavioral sciences. It was established in 2015 and is published by Elsevier as part of their Current Opinion series of journals. The editors-in-chief are Cindy Lustig (University of Michigan) and Trevor Robbins (University of Cambridge). Each issue covers a specific theme and is edited by one or more guest editors.

Abstracting and indexing

The journal is abstracted and indexed in Current Contents/Life Sciences, Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences, Embase, PsycINFO, Science Citation Index Expanded, Scopus, and the Social Sciences Citation Index. According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2022 impact factor of 5.0.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences” as academic journal. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Current, Opinion and Behavioral.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2015, 2022—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2015-01-01. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Current, Opinion and Behavioral providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences”, the useful work is to connect “academic journal” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 24, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q24907969. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2015 and 2022.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences primary sources, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences archive and Current research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.