CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Cultural artifact

artifact created or modified by humans which gives information about the culture of its creator and users

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 5, 2026
Entity authorityQ1791627
Source-derived summary

A cultural artifact, or cultural artefact (see American and British English spelling differences), is a term used in the social sciences, particularly anthropology, ethnology and sociology for anything created by humans which gives information about the culture of its creator and users. Artifact is the spelling in North American English; artefact is usually preferred elsewhere.

Cultural artifact is a more generic term and should be considered with two words of similar, but narrower, nuance: it can include objects recovered from archaeological sites, i.e. archaeological artifacts, but can also include objects of modern or early-modern society, or social artifacts. For example, in an anthropological context, a 17th-century lathe, a piece of faience, or a television each provides a wealth of information about the time in which it were manufactured and used.

Cultural artifacts, whether ancient or current, have significance because they offer insight into technological processes, economic development and social structure, among other attributes.

Classification

The philosopher Marx W. Wartofsky categorized artifacts as follows:

primary artifacts: used in production (such as a hammer, a fork, a lamp, or a camera);

secondary artifacts: relating to primary artifacts (such as a user manual for a camera);

tertiary artifacts: representations of secondary artifacts (such as a picture of a user manual for a camera).

Social artifacts, unlike archaeological artifacts, do not need to have a physical form (for example virtual artifact), nor to be of historical value (items created seconds ago can be classified as social artifacts).

References

Further reading

Habib, Laurence, and Line Wittek (2007). The portfolio as artifact and actor.

Editorial summary

“Cultural artifact” enters the record as artifact created or modified by humans which gives information about the culture of its creator and users. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Cultural, artifact and created can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2007—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Cultural, artifact and created.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Cultural artifact” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Cultural, artifact and created provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1791627. The first chronological checks are 2007.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cultural artifact”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cultural artifact primary sources, Cultural artifact archive and Cultural research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cultural artifact”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Cultural artifact” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.