CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Cuexcomate

tourist attractions in Puebla

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ3699213
Source-derived summary

Cuexcomate (Spanish pronunciation: [kweɣskoˈmate]) is an inactive geyser in Puebla city, Puebla state, Mexico. The sinter cone that the geyser built up around its vent is 13 metres (43 ft) tall and has a diameter of 23 metres (75 ft). A central crater within the cone is up to 8 metres (26 ft) wide and 17 metres (56 ft) deep (extending 4 metres (13 ft) below ground level).

Cuexcomate's name is derived from the Nahuatl term cuezcomatl "a large earthen jar used to store grain", which it resembles. The geyser was formed before the 1064 eruption of the Popocatépetl, an active volcano and the second highest peak in Mexico, which likely activated geothermal spring circulation that cut upward through Mesozoic limestone and deposited the geyser and the springs around it. The geyser's rock composition is 99% calcite, differing from typical silica sinter deposits.

Cuexcomate has been mistakenly called 'the smallest volcano in the world' because of the mistaken belief that it was a volcano, based on its shape. A metal spiral staircase allows tourists to descend into the excavated interior of the structure, where cultural events are occasionally held.

Characteristics

Geyser Type: calcitic chemical deposit

Height: 13 metres (43 ft)

Crater Diameter: 8 metres (26 ft).

Base Exterior Diameter: 23 metres (75 ft).

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Cuexcomate” as tourist attractions in Puebla. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Cuexcomate, tourist and attractions.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1064—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Cuexcomate, tourist and attractions providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Cuexcomate”, the useful work is to connect “tourist attractions in Puebla” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3699213. Authority coordinates are 19.071, -98.235. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1064.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cuexcomate”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cuexcomate primary sources, Cuexcomate archive and Cuexcomate research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cuexcomate”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Cuexcomate” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.