Euler brick
cuboid whose edges and face diagonals have integer lengths

In mathematics, an Euler brick, named after Leonhard Euler, is a rectangular cuboid whose edges and face diagonals all have integer lengths. A primitive Euler brick is an Euler brick whose edge lengths are relatively prime. A perfect Euler brick is one whose space diagonal is also an integer, but such a brick has not yet been found.
Definition
The definition of an Euler brick in geometric terms is equivalent to a solution to the following system of Diophantine equations:
{
a
2
+
b
2
=
d
2
a
2
+
c
2
=
e
2
b
2
+
c
2
=
f
2
{\displaystyle {\begin{cases}a^{2}+b^{2}=d^{2}\\a^{2}+c^{2}=e^{2}\\b^{2}+c^{2}=f^{2}\end{cases}}}
where a, b, c are the edges and d, e, f are the diagonals.
Properties
If (a, b, c) is a solution, then (ka, kb, kc) is also a solution for any k. Consequently, the solutions in rational numbers are all rescalings of integer solutions. Given an Euler brick with edge-lengths (a, b, c), the triple (bc, ac, ab) constitutes an Euler brick as well.
Exactly one edge and two face diagonals of a primitive Euler brick are odd.
At least two edges of an Euler brick are divisible by 3.
At least two edges of an Euler brick are divisible by 4.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Euler brick” is cuboid whose edges and face diagonals have integer lengths. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Euler, brick and cuboid, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “cuboid whose edges and face diagonals have integer lengths” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2463148. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Euler brick”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Euler brick primary sources, Euler brick archive and Euler research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Euler brick”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Euler brick” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.