CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

1920 Cuban general election

election in Cuba

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ5192071 ↗
Source-derived summary

General elections were held in Cuba on 1 November 1920. Alfredo Zayas y Alfonso won the presidential election, whilst the National League (an alliance of the National Conservative Party and the Cuban Popular Party) emerged as the largest faction in the House of Representatives, winning 31 of the 59 seats.

The Liberal Party accused Zayas and the Conservative Party of election fraud. The U.S. Ambassador to Cuba, Enoch Crowder, substantiated that fraud had occurred. As a consequence, new elections were held in four provinces.

Zayas was inaugurated on May 20, 1921.

Results

President

The figures do not include the results for Havana Province due to fraud and subsequent re-runs.

Editorial summary

“1920 Cuban general election” enters the record as election in Cuba. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Cuban, general and election can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1920, 1921—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Cuban, general and election.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“1920 Cuban general election” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Cuban, general and election provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5192071. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1920 and 1921.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “1920 Cuban general election”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 1920 Cuban general election primary sources, 1920 Cuban general election archive and Cuban research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “1920 Cuban general election”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “1920 Cuban general election” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.