Crystal Brook–Broken Hill railway line
railway line in New South Wales and South Australia

The Crystal Brook–Broken Hill railway line is a 371 kilometre line running from Crystal Brook to Broken Hill on the Australian Rail Track Corporation network.
History
In the 1875, the South Australian Railways built a narrow gauge line from Port Pirie to Gladstone. This was extended to Cockburn in 1888, where it joined with the Silverton Tramway.
In April 1963, the federal government decided to replace the narrow gauge line with a new standard gauge line to create an East-West rail corridor from Sydney to Perth. The new line opened in January 1970. Parts of the new line are on a different alignment than the old narrow gauge route. For example, the new line bypasses the town of Oodla Wirra, and followed a new alignment rather than the route of the Silverton Tramway.
In 1982, the Adelaide to Port Augusta line was converted to standard gauge. As part of this the junction with the Port Pirie to Broken Hill line was moved 24 kilometres east to Crystal Brook.
The 371 kilometre line is single track throughout with 13 crossing loops.
“Crystal Brook–Broken Hill railway line” enters the record as railway line in New South Wales and South Australia. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Crystal, Brook and Broken can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Crystal Brook–Broken Hill railway line” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Crystal, Brook and Broken provides the most credible route into that argument.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 22, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5191144. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1875, 1888, 1963 and 1970.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Crystal Brook–Broken Hill railway line”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Crystal Brook–Broken Hill railway line primary sources, Crystal Brook–Broken Hill railway line archive and Crystal research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Crystal Brook–Broken Hill railway line”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Crystal Brook–Broken Hill railway line” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.