CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Cryptocelis lilianae

species of worm

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ2287919 ↗
Source-derived summary

Cryptocelis lilianae is a species of flatworm belonging to the family Cryptocelidae. It is found within Brazil.

Description

C. lilianae is described as colorless, and oval in shape. Adult specimens can reach around 7 mm in length. It has a marginal band of eyes that completely encircles the body.

Etymology

The species is mentioned as being named for its collector, Liliana Forneris.

Editorial summary

“Cryptocelis lilianae” enters the record as species of worm. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Cryptocelis, lilianae and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current 62-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Cryptocelis, lilianae and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Cryptocelis lilianae” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Cryptocelis, lilianae and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2287919. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cryptocelis lilianae”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cryptocelis lilianae primary sources, Cryptocelis lilianae archive and Cryptocelis research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cryptocelis lilianae”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Cryptocelis lilianae” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.