CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Cryptandra lanosiflora

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 1, 2023
Entity authorityQ15539022
Source-derived summary

Cryptandra lanosiflora is a species of flowering plant in the family Rhamnaceae and is endemic to eastern Australia. It is a shrub with many branches, linear leaves, and hairy, white tube-shaped flowers.

Description

Cryptandra lanosiflora is a shrub that typically grows to a height of up to 60 cm (24 in) and has many branchlets 1–3 cm (0.39–1.18 in) long and covered with hairs when young. The leaves are linear and often clustered, mostly 2–4 mm (0.079–0.157 in) long and 1–2 mm (0.039–0.079 in) wide on a petiole 0.2–0.5 mm (0.0079–0.0197 in) long. There are narrow triangular stipules 0.9–1.8 mm (0.035–0.071 in) long at the base of the petioles. The edges of the leaves are rolled under, the upper surface more or less glabrous, the lower surface white, but usually obscured. The flowers are usually borne on short side branches with dark brown, overlapping bracts 1.8–2.1 mm (0.071–0.083 in) long at the base. The floral tube is about 5 mm (0.20 in) long, the lobes 1.0–1.6 mm (0.039–0.063 in) long and the petals are white, protruding slightly beyond the end of the floral tube, and hooded. Flowering occurs in September and October and the fruit is an oval capsule 2.3–2.6 mm (0.091–0.102 in) long, the seeds with a white aril.

Taxonomy and naming

Cryptandra lanosiflora was first formally described in 1862 by Ferdinand von Mueller in Fragmenta Phytographiae Australiae from specimens collected by Hermann Beckler.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Cryptandra lanosiflora” as species of plant. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Cryptandra, lanosiflora and species.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1862—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Cryptandra, lanosiflora and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Cryptandra lanosiflora”, the useful work is to connect “species of plant” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 1, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q15539022. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1862.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cryptandra lanosiflora”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cryptandra lanosiflora primary sources, Cryptandra lanosiflora archive and Cryptandra research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cryptandra lanosiflora”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Cryptandra lanosiflora” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.