CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Cryptandra inconspicua

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 7, 2023
Entity authorityQ15538569
Source-derived summary

Cryptandra inconspicua is a flowering plant in the family Rhamnaceae and is endemic to the southwest of Western Australia. It is a small, spreading shrub with narrowly elliptic to egg-shaped leaves and head-like clusters of white, tube-shaped flowers.

Description

Cryptandra inconspicua is a spreading, sometimes almost prostrate shrub that typically grows to a height of 10–20 cm (3.9–7.9 in) and unlike others in the genus, lacks spiny branchlets. The leaves are narrowly elliptic to egg-shaped with the narrower end towards the base, 2.0–3.7 mm (0.079–0.146 in) long and 0.7–1.5 mm (0.028–0.059 in) wide, on a petiole 0.3–0.4 mm (0.012–0.016 in) long with stipules 0.7–1.5 mm (0.028–0.059 in) long at the base. The edges of the leaves are rolled under, often concealing the densely hairy lower surface. The flowers are white, borne in head-like clusters of 3 to 8, 2.0–3.5 mm (0.079–0.138 in) wide. The flowers are surrounded by 2 to 4 hairy, egg-shaped bracts. The floral tube is about 0.9 mm (0.035 in) long and densely hairy, the sepals 0.5–0.6 mm (0.020–0.024 in) long and moderately hairy, and the petals are about 0.3 mm (0.012 in) long. Flowering occurs from July to October.

Taxonomy and naming

Cryptandra inconspicua was first formally described in 2007 by Barbara Lynette Rye in the journal Nuytsia from specimens collected by William Blackall between Pingrup and Lake Grace in 1933.

Editorial summary

“Cryptandra inconspicua” enters the record as species of plant. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Cryptandra, inconspicua and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2007, 1933—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Cryptandra, inconspicua and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Cryptandra inconspicua” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Cryptandra, inconspicua and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 7, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q15538569. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2007 and 1933.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cryptandra inconspicua”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cryptandra inconspicua primary sources, Cryptandra inconspicua archive and Cryptandra research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cryptandra inconspicua”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Cryptandra inconspicua” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.