CACrown ArchivesHistory · sources · collections
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Crymelon

town in Victoria, Australia

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 11, 2025
Entity authorityQ24190909
Source-derived summary

Crymelon is a locality in the Shire of Yarriambiack and the Shire of Hindmarsh, Victoria, Australia. At the 2021 census, Crymelon had a population of 15.

The locality had a Baptist church, and was described as an "important Baptist stronghold". Crymelon had a tennis club and played for the Yellangip Tennis Association Trophy. Today, little of the locality remains.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Crymelon” is town in Victoria, Australia. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Crymelon, town and Victoria, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA strong orientation record where physical form, institutional use and historical geography need to be read together. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2021—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Crymelon, town and Victoria is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “town in Victoria, Australia” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Maps, plans, fabric surveys and administrative records can establish how the site’s name, extent and function changed over time. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 11, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q24190909. Authority coordinates are -36.154, 142.268. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2021.

Critical limits

Modern boundaries and familiar names can conceal earlier jurisdictions or structures that do not align with the present site. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Crymelon”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Crymelon primary sources, Crymelon archive and Crymelon research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Crymelon”?
  2. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
  3. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Crymelon” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.