CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Doto coronata

species of mollusc

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ3142217
Source-derived summary

Doto coronata is a species of small sea slug or nudibranch, a shell-less marine gastropod mollusc in the family Dotidae. It is the type species of the genus Doto.

Doto coronata sensu lato

Before 1976 a number of species were called by the name Doto coronata and the process of splitting this complex into species was started by Henning Lemche. Species with translucent white bodies and red or black spots on the cerata which were formerly identified as Doto coronata include:

Doto africoronata Shipman & Gosliner, 2015

Doto dunnei Lemche, 1976

Doto eireana Lemche, 1976

Doto hydrallmaniae Morrow, Thorpe & Picton, 1992

Doto koenneckeri Lemche, 1976

Doto maculata (Montagu, 1804)

Doto millbayana Lemche, 1976

Doto onusta Hesse, 1872

Doto sarsiae Morrow, Thorpe & Picton, 1992

Distribution

The type locality for this species is on the Dutch coast. A specimen from near Goes, Eastern Scheldt, Zeeland was designated as a neotype in a recent review of the genus Doto. It has been reported elsewhere in the North Atlantic Ocean (European waters, Canada, Gulf of Maine) and the Mediterranean Sea (Greece) but many records are likely to be of sibling species. It was erroneously reported from around the South African coast where it is found from the Atlantic coast to Knysna and this species has been described as Doto africoronata.

Description

This species is a small nudibranch, with grape-bunch-like clusters of cerata extending in pairs along the sides of the body. In all Doto the rhinophores extend from cup-like sheaths. Doto coronata is translucent white in colour with mottling of dark red on the back and sides of the body.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Doto coronata” as species of mollusc. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1976, 2015, 1992, 1804—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Doto, coronata and species can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as species of mollusc. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3142217. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1976, 2015, 1992 and 1804.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Doto coronata”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Doto coronata primary sources, Doto coronata archive and Doto research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Doto coronata”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Doto coronata” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.