CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Sarcopterygii

superclass or class of fishes

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ160830 ↗
Source-derived summary

Sarcopterygii (; from Ancient Greek σάρξ (sárx) 'flesh' and πτέρυξ (ptérux) 'wing, fin') is a clade (traditionally a class or subclass) of vertebrate animals which includes a group of bony fishes and all four legged land animals, including humans. The common name for this clade is lobe-finned fish.

Lobe-finned fish have muscular limb buds (lobes) within their fins, which are supported by appendicular skeletons. This is in contrast to the other clade of bony fishes, the Actinopterygii, which have only skin-covered bony spines supporting the fins.

Sarcopterygii emerged in the Silurian and early Devonian periods consisting entirely of aquatic species, but today the vast majority of its species are land animals called tetrapods. This mostly terrestrial clade of vertebrates are now recognized as having evolved from sarcopterygian ancestors and are most closely related to lungfishes. The lobed fins evolved into limbs, and foregut diverticulum eventually evolved into air-breathing lungs. These changes made it possible for tetrapods to explore and eventually permeate terrestrial ecosystems. While it is technically correct to include tetrapod species with Sarcopterygii, the phrase "lobe-finned fish" normally refers to the aquatic species that are not tetrapods.

Most species of lobe-finned fish are now extinct, but during the Carboniferous and Permian periods these non-tetrapod sarcopterygians were dominant predators of freshwater ecosystems.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Sarcopterygii” as superclass or class of fishes. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Sarcopterygii, superclass and class.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 212-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Sarcopterygii, superclass and class providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Sarcopterygii”, the useful work is to connect “superclass or class of fishes” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q160830. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Sarcopterygii”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Sarcopterygii primary sources, Sarcopterygii archive and Sarcopterygii research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sarcopterygii”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Sarcopterygii” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.