CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Craterellus ignicolor

species of fungi in the genus Craterellus

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 6, 2026
Entity authorityQ107600504
Source-derived summary

Craterellus ignicolor is an edible fungus, also known as the flame-colored chanterelle. It was first described as C. ignicolor in 1975 from Tennessee, USA; prior to 1975, it was referred to as Cantharellus lutescens and C. infundibuliformis var. luteolus. In 2000, DNA analysis showed that this chanterelle should be classified within Craterellus, rather than in Cantharellus as previously thought.

Craterellus ignicolor fruiting bodies commonly grow amongst moss in areas with significant shade, such as coniferous or hardwood forests, and tend to occur scattered and in groups or clusters during the summer-fall. They can be both mycorrhizal (symbiotic) with trees or saprotrophic (feeding off dead plant material). Pinkish or brownish-orange false gills, one of their most defining features, are visible on the underside of the cap. The center of these caps becomes perforated with age, where it develops a clear, vase-like appearance with a hollow stalk. The lower surface of the fungus is pale yellow to yellow-orange when young, then tends to develop pinkish or lavender hues with age; its spore print is pale pinkish-yellow. Its taste and odor are not known to be distinctive.

Editorial summary

“Craterellus ignicolor” enters the record as species of fungi in the genus Craterellus. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Craterellus, ignicolor and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1975, 2000—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Craterellus, ignicolor and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Craterellus ignicolor” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Craterellus, ignicolor and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q107600504. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1975 and 2000.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Craterellus ignicolor”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Craterellus ignicolor primary sources, Craterellus ignicolor archive and Craterellus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Craterellus ignicolor”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Craterellus ignicolor” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.