CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Cratena

genus of molluscs

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ3139460
Source-derived summary

Cratena is a genus of sea slugs, aeolid nudibranchs, marine gastropod molluscs in the family Facelinidae.

Cratena is the type genus of the subfamily Crateninae.

Species

Species within the genus Cratena include:

Cratena affinis (Baba, 1949)

Cratena capensis Barnard, 1927 - orange-eyed nudibranch

Cratena lineata Eliot, 1905

Cratena minor Padula, Araújo, Matthews-Cascon & Schrödl, 2014

Cratena pawarshindeorum Bharate, Padula, Apte & Shimpi, 2020

Cratena peregrina (Gmelin, 1791)

Cratena pilata (Gould, 1870)

Cratena poshitraensis Bharate, Padula, Apte & Shimpi, 2020

Cratena scintilla Ortea & Moro, 1998

Cratena simba Edmunds, 1970

Cratena tema Edmunds, 2015

Taxa inquirenda

Cratena cornuta (Risbec, 1928)

Cratena diffusa (Risbec, 1928)

Cratena grisea (Risbec, 1928)

Species brought into synonymy

Cratena anulata Baba, 1949: synonym of Cuthona anulata (Baba, 1949)

Cratena cavanca Bergh, 1898: synonym of Phidiana lottini (Lesson, 1831)

Cratena exigua Thiele, 1912: synonym of Cuthona georgiana (Pfeffer in Martens & Pfeffer, 1886)

Cratena fructuosa Bergh, 1892: synonym of Cuthona fructuosa (Bergh, 1892)

Cratena genovae O'Donoghue, 1929: synonym of Cuthona genovae (O'Donoghue, 1929)

Cratena gymnota (Couthouy, 1838): synonym of Cuthona gymnota (Couthouy, 1838)

Cratena hirsuta Bergh, 1864: synonym of Cuthona nana (Alder & Hancock, 1842)

Cratena kaoruae Marcus, 1957: synonym of Cratena pilata (Gould, 1870)

Cratena lugubris Bergh, 1870: synonym of Phestilla lugubris (Bergh, 1870)

Cratena macphersonae Burn, 1962: synonym of Phyllodesmium macphersonae (Burn, 1962)

Cratena nigricolora Baba, 1955: synonym of Catriona nigricolora (Baba, 1955)

Cratena pinnifera Baba, 1949: synonym of Catriona pinnifera (Baba, 1949)

Cratena piutaensis Ortea, Caballer & Espinosa, 2003: synonym of Anetarca piutaensis (Ortea, Caballer & Espinosa, 2003)

Cratena puellula Baba, 1955: synonym of Cuthona puellula (Baba, 1955)

Cratena pusilla Bergh, 1898: synonym of Cuthona pusilla (Bergh, 1898)

Cratena valentini Eliot, 1907: synonym of Cuthona valentini (Eliot, 1907)

Cratena venusta Baba, 1949: synonym of Catriona venusta (Baba, 1949)

Cratena veronicae A. E. Verrill, 1880: synonym of Cuthona veronicae (A. E. Verrill, 1880)

Cratena vittata (Alder & Hancock, 1842): synonym of Eubranchus vittatus (Alder & Hancock, 1842)

Cratena yatsui Baba, 1930: synonym of Herviella yatsui (Baba, 1930)

References

Bergh R. 1864. Anatomiske bidrag til kundskab om Aeolidierne. Det Kongelige Videnskabernes Selskabs Skrifter, Naturvidenskabelige og Mathematiske Afdeling, 7: 139–316

ICZN. (1966). Opinion 776. Cratena Bergh, 1864 (Gastropoda): Added to the Official List of Generic Names. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Cratena” as genus of molluscs. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1949, 1927, 1905, 2014—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Cratena, genus and molluscs can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as genus of molluscs. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3139460. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1949, 1927, 1905 and 2014.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cratena”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cratena primary sources, Cratena archive and Cratena research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cratena”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Cratena” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.