CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Craig Treleven

Australian rules footballer

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 28, 2025
Entity authorityQ5181539
Source-derived summary

Craig 'Jock' Treleven (born 14 June 1970) is a former Australian rules footballer who played with Hawthorn in the Australian Football League (AFL).

A ruck-rover, Treleven was recruited to Hawthorn after an impressive season for East Fremantle in 1995. That season he had won both a Sandover Medal and Simpson Medal, the latter as West Australia's best player in their interstate match against Queensland.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Craig Treleven” as australian rules footballer. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Craig, Treleven and Australian.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1970, 1995—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1970-06-14. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Craig, Treleven and Australian providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Craig Treleven”, the useful work is to connect “australian rules footballer” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 28, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5181539. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1970 and 1995.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Craig Treleven”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Craig Treleven primary sources, Craig Treleven archive and Craig research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Craig Treleven”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Craig Treleven” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.