CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy condition

mathematical condition for convergence

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 12, 2025
Entity authorityQ1023483 ↗
Source-derived summary

In mathematics, the convergence condition by Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy (CFL) is a necessary condition for convergence while solving certain partial differential equations (usually hyperbolic PDEs) numerically. It arises in the numerical analysis of explicit time integration schemes, when these are used for the numerical solution. As a consequence, the time step must be less than a certain upper bound, given a fixed spatial increment, in many explicit time-marching computer simulations; otherwise, the simulation produces incorrect or unstable results. The condition is named after Richard Courant, Kurt Friedrichs, and Hans Lewy who described it in their 1928 paper.

Heuristic description

The principle behind the condition is that, for example, if a wave is moving across a discrete spatial grid and we want to compute its amplitude at discrete time steps of equal duration, then this duration must be less than the time for the wave to travel to adjacent grid points. As a corollary, when the grid point separation is reduced, the upper limit for the time step also decreases. In essence, the numerical domain of dependence of any point in space and time (as determined by initial conditions and the parameters of the approximation scheme) must include the analytical domain of dependence (wherein the initial conditions have an effect on the exact value of the solution at that point) to assure that the scheme can access the information required to form the solution.

Statement

To make a reasonably formally precise statement of the condition, it is necessary to define the following quantities:

Spatial coordinate: one of the coordinates of the physical space in which the problem is posed

Spatial dimension of the problem: the number

n

{\displaystyle n}

of spatial dimensions, i.e., the number of spatial coordinates of the physical space where the problem is posed. Typical values are

n

=

1

{\displaystyle n=1}

,

n

=

2

{\displaystyle n=2}

and

n

=

3

{\displaystyle n=3}

.

Time: the coordinate, acting as a parameter, which describes the evolution of the system, distinct from the spatial coordinates

The spatial coordinates and the time are discrete-valued independent variables, which are placed at regular distances called the interval length and the time step, respectively.

Editorial summary

“Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy condition” enters the record as mathematical condition for convergence. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Courant, Friedrichs and Lewy can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1928—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Courant, Friedrichs and Lewy.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy condition” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Courant, Friedrichs and Lewy provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 12, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q1023483. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1928.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy condition”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy condition primary sources, Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy condition archive and Courant research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy condition”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy condition” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.