CACrown ArchivesHistory · sources · collections
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Natural number

ambiguous mathematical term used either for non-negative or for strictly positive integers, depending on usage

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ21199
Source-derived summary

In mathematics, the natural numbers are the numbers used for counting up, starting from 0 or 1. The first few natural numbers are 0 (if included), 1, 2, 3, and so on. The terms positive integers, non-negative integers, whole numbers, and counting numbers are also used. The set of the natural numbers is commonly denoted by a bold N or a blackboard bold ⁠

N

{\displaystyle \mathbb {N} }

⁠.

The natural numbers are used for counting, and for labeling the result of a count, such as: "there are seven days in a week", in which case they are called cardinal numbers. They are also used to label places in an ordered series, such as: "the third day of the month", in which case they are called ordinal numbers.

Natural numbers are commonly expressed in writing using ten symbols called digits (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9). These expressions, called numerals, can also be used as unique identifiers or labels (like the jersey numbers of a sports team) that are referred to as nominal numbers, which resemble natural numbers but have no specific mathematical properties.

Natural numbers can be compared by magnitude, with larger numbers coming after smaller ones in the list 1, 2, 3, .... This gives a total order on the natural numbers.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Natural number” as ambiguous mathematical term used either for non-negative or for strictly positive integers, depending on usage. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Natural, number and ambiguous.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 219-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Natural, number and ambiguous providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Natural number”, the useful work is to connect “ambiguous mathematical term used either for non-negative or for strictly positive integers, depending on usage” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q21199. The Library of Congress control number is sh85093214. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Natural number”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Natural number primary sources, Natural number archive and Natural research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Natural number”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Natural number” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.