CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Agropyron

genus of plants

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 18, 2025
Entity authorityQ162731
Source-derived summary

Agropyron is a genus of Eurasian plants in the grass family), native to Europe and Asia but widely naturalized in North America.

Species in the genus are commonly referred to as wheatgrass.

Species

Agropyron badamense - Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan

Agropyron bulbosum - Iran

Agropyron cimmericum - Ukraine, Crimea

Agropyron cristatum - Crested wheatgrass - Eurasia + North Africa from Spain + Morocco to Korea + Khabarovsk; naturalized in western + central North America (United States, Canada, northern Mexico)

Agropyron dasyanthum - Ukraine

Agropyron desertorum - Desert Wheatgrass - from Crimea + Caucasus to Mongolia + Siberia

Agropyron deweyi - Turkey

Agropyron fragile - Siberian wheatgrass - from Caucasus to Mongolia; naturalized in scattered locales in western United States + Canada

Agropyron michnoi - Buryatiya, Zabaykalsky Krai, Mongolia, Inner Mongolia

Agropyron mongolicum - Gansu, Inner Mongolia, Ningxia, Shaanxi, Shanxi, Xinjiang

Agropyron × pilosiglume - European Russia

Agropyron tanaiticum - Ukraine, European Russia

Agropyron thomsonii - Western Himalayas

Agropyron tsukushiense (Honda) Ohwi Ohwi synonym Elymus tsukushiensis

Agropyron tsukushiense var. transiens (Hack.) Ohwi synonym Elymus tsukushiensis

formerly included

species now considered better suited in other genera: Crithopsis Elymus Kengyilia Leymus Thinopyrum Vulpia etc.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Agropyron” as genus of plants. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Agropyron, genus and plants.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current 191-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Agropyron, genus and plants providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Agropyron”, the useful work is to connect “genus of plants” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 18, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q162731. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Agropyron”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Agropyron primary sources, Agropyron archive and Agropyron research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Agropyron”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Agropyron” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.