CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Tazlăul Sărat

river in Romania

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ7690463 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Tazlăul Sărat is a right tributary of the river Tazlău in Romania. It discharges into the Tazlău in Tescani. The following towns and villages are situated along the river Tazlăul Sărat, from source to mouth: Bolătău, Zemeș, Moinești, Găzărie, Prohozești, Negreni, Șesuri, Leontinești and Ardeoani. Its length is 46 km (29 mi) and its basin size is 210 km2 (81 sq mi).

Editorial summary

“Tazlăul Sărat” enters the record as river in Romania. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Tazlăul, Sărat and river can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA valuable geographic starting point for tracing changing names, boundaries, uses and administrative responsibility. The current 63-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Tazlăul, Sărat and river.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Tazlăul Sărat” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Tazlăul, Sărat and river provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The strongest evidence will usually combine a dated visual record with documents produced by the authority responsible for the place. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7690463. Authority coordinates are 46.509, 26.669. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

A single description cannot reconcile every naming convention, rebuilding phase or administrative transfer associated with a place. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Tazlăul Sărat”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Tazlăul Sărat primary sources, Tazlăul Sărat archive and Tazlăul research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Tazlăul Sărat”?
  2. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
  3. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Tazlăul Sărat” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.