CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Kosmos 772

1975 Soviet test spaceflight

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 3, 2025
Entity authorityQ1770788
Source-derived summary

Kosmos 772 (Russian: Космос 772 meaning Cosmos 772) was an uncrewed military Soyuz 7K-S test. It was an unsuccessful mission as only one transmitter worked. Only the 166 MHz frequency transmitter operated, all of the other normal Soyuz wavelengths transmitters failed. The experience from these flights were used in the development of the successor program Soyuz spacecraft the Soyuz 7K-ST.

Mission parameters

Spacecraft: Soyuz 7K-S

Mass: 6750 kg

Crew: None

Launched: September 29, 1975

Landed: October 3, 1975 4:10 UTC

Perigee: 154 km

Apogee: 245 km

Inclination: 51.8 deg

Duration: 3.99 days

Maneuver Summary

193 km X 270 km orbit to 195 km X 300 km orbit. Delta V: 8 m/s.

196 km X 300 km orbit to 196 km X 328 km orbit. Delta V: 8 m/s.

Total Delta V: 16 m/s.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Kosmos 772” as 1975 Soviet test spaceflight. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Kosmos, Soviet and test.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1975—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Kosmos, Soviet and test providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Kosmos 772”, the useful work is to connect “1975 Soviet test spaceflight” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 3, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q1770788. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1975.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Kosmos 772”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Kosmos 772 primary sources, Kosmos 772 archive and Kosmos research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Kosmos 772”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Kosmos 772” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.