CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Cosine error

type of measurement error

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 9, 2026
Entity authorityQ48739578
Source-derived summary

Cosine error is a type of measurement error caused by the difference between the intended and actual directions in which a measurement is taken. Depending on the type of measurement, it either multiplies or divides the true value by the cosine of the angle between the two directions.

For small angles the resulting error is typically very small, since an angle needs to be relatively large for its cosine to depart significantly from 1.

Approximate error sizes for a few example angles are:

The error is equivalent to treating the hypotenuse and one of the other sides of a right-angled triangle as if they were equal; the cosine of the angle between them is the ratio of their lengths.

Concept

A simple example of cosine error is taking a measurement across a rectangle but failing to realize that the line of measurement is not quite parallel with the edges, being slightly diagonal. Rather than measuring the desired vector (in this case, orthogonal width), the instrument is measuring the hypotenuse of a triangle in which the desired vector is in fact one of the legs. The cosine of this triangle correlates to how much error exists in the measurement (hence the name cosine error). Thus the user might measure a block of metal and come away with a width of 208.92 mm when the true width is 208.91 mm, a difference that matters to the subsequent machining.

Examples

Some practical examples in which the potential for cosine error must be considered include:

The use of an indicator (distance amplifying instrument)

Laser interferometry

Speed limit enforcement

Lidar traffic enforcement

Radar traffic enforcement

Mitigation

The longer the length of the instrument, the easier it is to control cosine error. If the instrument is very small, then optical alignment techniques can be used to reduce cosine error.

Editorial summary

“Cosine error” enters the record as type of measurement error. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Cosine, error and type can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 303-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Cosine, error and type.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Cosine error” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Cosine, error and type provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 9, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q48739578.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cosine error”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cosine error primary sources, Cosine error archive and Cosine research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cosine error”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Cosine error” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.