CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Corynebacterium diphtheriae

species of bacterium

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ131649 ↗
Source-derived summary

Corynebacterium diphtheriae is a Gram-positive pathogenic bacterium that causes diphtheria. It is also known as the Klebs–Löffler bacillus because it was discovered in 1884 by German bacteriologists Edwin Klebs (1834–1913) and Friedrich Löffler (1852–1915). While nontoxigenic C. diphtheriae may rarely produce systemic disease by invading tissues, virulence is enhanced when the bacteria are infected by a bacteriophage carrying a gene which gives rise to a toxin. This toxin causes the disease.

Diphtheria is caused by the adhesion and infiltration of the bacteria into the mucosal layers of the body, primarily affecting the respiratory tract and causing the subsequent release of an exotoxin. The toxin has a localized effect on skin lesions, as well as a metastatic, proteolytic effects on other organ systems in severe infections. Originally a major cause of childhood mortality, respiratory diphtheria has become rare in the United States by the vigorous administration of diphtheria vaccines starting in 1914.

The incidence of diphtheria has decreased since the development of a toxoid vaccine in 1923. Although diphtheria outbreaks continue to occur, this is often in developing countries where the majority of the population is not vaccinated. Cutaneous diphtheria, skin lesions infected by toxigenic C. diphtheriae, are prevalent in tropical climates and may contribute to diphtheria outbreaks.

Editorial summary

“Corynebacterium diphtheriae” enters the record as species of bacterium. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Corynebacterium, diphtheriae and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1884, 1834, 1913, 1852—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Corynebacterium, diphtheriae and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Corynebacterium diphtheriae” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Corynebacterium, diphtheriae and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q131649. The Library of Congress control number is sh88023241. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1884, 1834, 1913 and 1852.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Corynebacterium diphtheriae”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Corynebacterium diphtheriae primary sources, Corynebacterium diphtheriae archive and Corynebacterium research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Corynebacterium diphtheriae”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Corynebacterium diphtheriae” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.