CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Corpus Cluniacense

collection of Latin writings about Islam compiled in 1142–1143

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 22, 2025
Entity authorityQ2997841
Source-derived summary

The Corpus Cluniacense or Corpus Islamolatinum, sometimes erroneously the Corpus Toledanum, is a collection of Latin writings about Islam compiled in 1142–1143. At its centre are translations from Arabic of five Islamic works, including the Qurʾān. The corpus was commissioned by Abbot Peter the Venerable of Cluny during a trip to Spain. The team of translators was led by Robert of Ketton, who translated the Qurʾān. The other translators were Herman of Carinthia, Peter of Toledo and a Muslim named Muḥammad. They were assisted in their Latin by Peter of Poitiers.

The Corpus comprises:

a brief introduction

Summa totius haeresis ac diabolice secte Sarracenorum ('Sum of all the Heresies and Diabolical Sect of the Saracens'), a summary that Peter of Poitiers composed of Peter the Venerable's Liber contra sectam siue haeresim Sarracenorum

Epistula domini Petri abbatis ad dominum Bernardum Clare Uallis abbatem, the letter of Peter the Venerable addressed to Bernard of Clairvaux

Prologus ('Prologue'), an introduction written by Robert of Ketton to the two or three works which follow, sometimes interpreted as a letter to Peter the Venerable

Chronica mendosa et ridicula Sarracenorum ('Mistake-Laden and Ridiculous Chronicle of the Saracens'), a history of Islam translated by Robert of Ketton from an unidentified original

Liber de generatione Mahumet et nutritura eius ('Book of Muḥammad's Genealogy and his Nurturing'), a translation of Abū al-Ḥasan Bakrī's Kitāb al-anwār by Herman of Carinthia

De doctrina Mahumet ('Doctrine of Muḥammad'), a translation of the Masāʾil ʿAbdallāh ibn Salām, an apocryphal account of Muḥammad answering questions from four Jewish inquirers led by Abū al-Ḥārith ʿAbdallāh ibn Salām, originally of the 7th or 8th century, translated by Herman of Carinthia

Prephacio ('Preface'), Robert of Ketton's introduction to his translation of the Qurʾān

Lex Sarracenorum ('Law of the Saracens'), Robert of Ketton's translation of the Qurʾān

Epistola Saraceni et rescriptum Christiani ('Letter of the Saracen and the Response of the Christian'), Peter of Toledo's translation of the Apology of al-Kindi

The earliest manuscript containing most of the Corpus is Paris, Bibliothèque de l'Arsenal, Lat. 1162, which dates to the 12th century. This manuscript also contains the earliest depiction of Muḥammad in western Europe. It also contains a unique heading, Fabulae Sarracenorum ('Tales of the Saracens'), before Robert of Ketton's prologue to the chronicle.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Corpus Cluniacense” as collection of Latin writings about Islam compiled in 1142–1143. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1142, 1143, 1162—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Corpus, Cluniacense and Latin can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as collection of Latin writings about Islam compiled in 1142–1143. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 22, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q2997841. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1142, 1143 and 1162.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Corpus Cluniacense”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Corpus Cluniacense primary sources, Corpus Cluniacense archive and Corpus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Corpus Cluniacense”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Corpus Cluniacense” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.