CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Corporate Technology Directory

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 31, 2026
Entity authorityQ5172435 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Corporate Technology Directory also known as the CorpTech directory of technology companies was a directory of technology companies published from 1986 to 2004 by CorpTech. It listed thousands of technology companies including software, services, and hardware as well as developers.

The directory was later made available in digital form as a cd and subsequently database subscription.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Corporate Technology Directory” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Corporate, Technology and Directory.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1986, 2004—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Corporate, Technology and Directory providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Corporate Technology Directory”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 31, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5172435. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1986 and 2004.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Corporate Technology Directory”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Corporate Technology Directory primary sources, Corporate Technology Directory archive and Corporate research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Corporate Technology Directory”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Corporate Technology Directory” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.