Cork gunpowder explosion
1810 disaster in Cork, Ireland
The Cork gunpowder explosion was a large explosion that took place in Cork, Ireland, on 3 November 1810.
Twenty-two people were killed and over 40 injured when gunpowder stored in a labourer's house in Brandy Lane, Cork, exploded. A subsequent inquiry revealed that several employees of the Ballincollig Royal Gunpowder Mills (then the largest gunpowder manufacturing plant in the world), had been systematically stealing the material which was then sold on to quarrymen for rock blasting.
Figures compiled by the Gunpowder Works authorities showed that almost half a ton was unaccounted for in the nine-month period preceding the disaster.
During the course of the inquiry it was discovered that the illicit gunpowder had to be dried when brought to the house on Brandy Lane in the St Finbarr's area of the city. The method of drying reportedly involved a lit candle. In addition, one of the men involved on the night of the explosion, was seen drinking heavily in a local tavern.
A disaster fund was opened for the victims and their dependents to which over £12,000 was subscribed within two weeks.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Cork gunpowder explosion” is 1810 disaster in Cork, Ireland. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Cork, gunpowder and explosion, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “1810 disaster in Cork, Ireland” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5170789. Authority coordinates are 51.893, -8.485. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1810.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Cork gunpowder explosion”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Cork gunpowder explosion primary sources, Cork gunpowder explosion archive and Cork research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cork gunpowder explosion”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Cork gunpowder explosion” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.