CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Confidence interval

range of estimates for an unknown parameter

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ208498 ↗
Source-derived summary

In frequentist inference, a confidence interval (CI) determines lower and upper bounds likely to contain (in repeated sampling) the true value of an unknown statistical parameter, such as a population mean. Rather than reporting a single point estimate (e.g. "the average screen time is 3 hours per day"), a confidence interval provides an interval, such as from 2 hours to 4 hours.

A confidence interval is based on a pre-defined coverage probability, called confidence level, typically 95%. A 95% confidence level does not imply a 95% probability that the true parameter lies within a particular CI calculated from a sample (such interpretation would be associated with the credible interval in Bayesian inference). The confidence level instead reflects the long-run performance of the method used to generate the interval. In other words, if the same sampling procedure were repeated 100 times from the same population, approximately 95 of the resulting intervals would be expected to contain the true population mean. The frequentist approach sees the true population mean as a fixed unknown constant, while the confidence interval is calculated using data from a random sample. Because the sample is random, the interval endpoints are random variables.

Definition

Let

X

{\displaystyle X}

be a random sample from a probability distribution with statistical parameter

(

θ

,

φ

)

{\displaystyle (\theta ,\varphi )}

.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Confidence interval” as range of estimates for an unknown parameter. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 221-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Confidence, interval and range can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as range of estimates for an unknown parameter. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q208498. The Library of Congress control number is sh85030927. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Confidence interval”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Confidence interval primary sources, Confidence interval archive and Confidence research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Confidence interval”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Confidence interval” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.