CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Control variates

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 10, 2025
Entity authorityQ3554721
Source-derived summary

The control variates method is a variance reduction technique used in Monte Carlo methods. It exploits information about the errors in estimates of known quantities to reduce the error of an estimate of an unknown quantity.

Underlying principle

Let the unknown parameter of interest be

μ

{\displaystyle \mu }

, and assume we have a statistic

m

{\displaystyle m}

such that the expected value of m is μ:

E

[

m

]

=

μ

{\displaystyle \mathbb {E} \left[m\right]=\mu }

, i.e. m is an unbiased estimator for μ. Suppose we calculate another statistic

t

{\displaystyle t}

such that

E

[

t

]

=

τ

{\displaystyle \mathbb {E} \left[t\right]=\tau }

is a known value. Then

m

=

m

+

c

(

t

τ

)

{\displaystyle m^{\star }=m+c\left(t-\tau \right)\,}

is also an unbiased estimator for

μ

{\displaystyle \mu }

for any choice of the coefficient

c

{\displaystyle c}

.

The variance of the resulting estimator

m

{\displaystyle m^{\star }}

is

Var

(

m

)

=

Var

(

m

)

+

c

2

Var

(

t

)

+

2

c

Cov

(

m

,

t

)

.

{\displaystyle {\textrm {Var}}\left(m^{\star }\right)={\textrm {Var}}\left(m\right)+c^{2}\,{\textrm {Var}}\left(t\right)+2c\,{\textrm {Cov}}\left(m,t\right).}

By differentiating the above expression with respect to

c

{\displaystyle c}

, it can be shown that choosing the optimal coefficient

c

=

Cov

(

m

,

t

)

Var

(

t

)

{\displaystyle c^{\star }=-{\frac {{\textrm {Cov}}\left(m,t\right)}{{\textrm {Var}}\left(t\right)}}}

minimizes the variance of

m

{\displaystyle m^{\star }}

. (Note that this coefficient is the same as the coefficient obtained from a linear regression.) With this choice,

Var

(

m

)

=

Var

(

m

)

[

Cov

(

m

,

t

)

]

2

Var

(

t

)

=

(

1

ρ

m

,

t

2

)

Var

(

m

)

{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\textrm {Var}}\left(m^{\star }\right)&={\textrm {Var}}\left(m\right)-{\frac {\left[{\textrm {Cov}}\left(m,t\right)\right]^{2}}{{\textrm {Var}}\left(t\right)}}\\&=\left(1-\rho _{m,t}^{2}\right){\textrm {Var}}\left(m\right)\end{aligned}}}

where

ρ

m

,

t

=

Corr

(

m

,

t

)

{\displaystyle \rho _{m,t}={\textrm {Corr}}\left(m,t\right)\,}

is the correlation coefficient of

m

{\displaystyle m}

and

t

{\displaystyle t}

. The greater the value of

|

ρ

m

,

t

|

{\displaystyle \vert \rho _{m,t}\vert }

, the greater the variance reduction achieved.

Editorial summary

“Control variates” enters the record as open-knowledge reference entry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Control, variates and Open-knowledge can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 364-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Control, variates and Open-knowledge.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Control variates” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Control, variates and Open-knowledge provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 10, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q3554721. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Control variates”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Control variates primary sources, Control variates archive and Control research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Control variates”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Control variates” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.