CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Contemporary Education Dialogue

academic journal

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ24956233 ↗
Source-derived summary

Contemporary Education Dialogue is an open forum for discussing issues in education. It is published twice a year by SAGE Publishing in association with the Education Dialogue Trust. The journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics. It is edited by Shailaja Menon and Disha Nawani.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Contemporary Education Dialogue” is academic journal. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Contemporary, Education and Dialogue, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 48-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2003-01-01. For this dossier, Contemporary, Education and Dialogue is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “academic journal” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q24956233. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Contemporary Education Dialogue”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Contemporary Education Dialogue primary sources, Contemporary Education Dialogue archive and Contemporary research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Contemporary Education Dialogue”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Contemporary Education Dialogue” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.